Previous Entry | Next Entry

Death of Scaffolding

  • Apr. 13th, 2009 at 9:25 AM
last unicorn - remember your heart
It's a messy morning of word death in this manuscript. First person present is still a pain in the behind (alas, Imogene will narrate in nothing else), but apparently I've learned a few things since I worked on this last year.

No paragraph is safe. I wield the delete key of death.

--

1a. I check the way before standing and creeping across. It's empty, which doesn't feel right, but I urge the look-away spell to course stronger over me, and slip to stand next to the door.

1b. The courtyard is empty when I creep across. That doesn't feel right, but I urge my look-away spell stronger and pause next to the door.

--

2a. There are five distinct voices and shades of anger leaking from the room. The smoky smell clots in my nose and makes breathing difficult, but I search the bushes for Aiden and signal the number to him. He nods and positions himself so his crossbow is balanced on his knee, poisoned bolt aimed.

2b. Five voices leak from the room. The smoky reek of their anger makes breathing difficult as I search the bushes for Aiden and signal the number. He nods, balances his crossbow on his knee, and aims the poison bolt.

--

3a. I try the knob, but it's locked. No time to run back and get Aiden's lockpicks: someone will have heard that. Instead, I lower myself to sit on my heels and press my shoulder against the wall, waiting as the voices inside stop. Someone inside is afraid; the sour stink of urine grows stronger when the lock clicks and someone takes hold of the knob.

3b. The knob sticks: locked. The voices inside quiet, leaving me no time to fetch Aiden's lockpicks. Instead I crouch, press my shoulder to the wall, and wait as the sour stink of fear grows stronger inside. The lock clicks and the door cracks open.

--

Not perfect, but better.

Comments

( 29 words — Leave a word )
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 01:29 pm (UTC)
Imogene?

I recently sold a novella where the POV is named Imogen. The spell check kept trying to change it to Imogene...
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 01:32 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I've seen it both ways a lot. Imogen seems most popular, actually. Firefox likes it. But Firefox is also okay with Imogene.

It's a good name.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 02:49 pm (UTC)
The second and third Eddas books, by the way, have an Imogen.

It's The Name Of The Year.
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:17 pm (UTC)
They should all get together and have a party.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 01:30 pm (UTC)
And I should add that in the sequel, she has a son named Aidan...

Freaky.
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 01:32 pm (UTC)
Creepy!
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 02:13 pm (UTC)
Specially like your fixes to the last one.
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 02:33 pm (UTC)
Yeah, the original was pretty confusing, wasn't it. :)
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 02:44 pm (UTC)
It's more that the new version captures the urgency and tension with its short, clipped sentences. Plus, you get rid of the three cases of "someone." (<--not something I'd notice just reading along, but when you highlight the before and the after, it stands out.)
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:19 pm (UTC)
Huh. Good call. You know, I didn't notice the someones until you pointed them out.
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:34 pm (UTC)
Seriously, I wouldn't either, if I hadn't been thinking about why I liked the revised sentence better than the original. (I hate finding these things in my own stuff. But worrying about it first time round makes writing almost impossible, so it's better, I think, to have bunches of someones first time around...)
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:37 pm (UTC)
I agree. Though I do notice that, as I learn more about snappy sentences, I tend to write them snappier the first time 'round. Which doesn't mean the sentences don't still need revision -- they certainly do -- but internalizing the lessons you learn while editing fiercely like this does a lot of good.
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:46 pm (UTC)
*nods*

My own writing (which I'm getting to work on right now--yay!) has gotten much slower as I think more carefully about stuff first time round--so yeah, I hear you. I feel mixed about it. I wish I could build up a little more speed. But yeah, I think it's better (but not perfect) out the gate when I take it slow...
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 04:17 pm (UTC)
Glad you're getting to write! That's great news. And it sounds like what you're doing is normal. Most people slow down as they learn, or so I am told.
[info]sartorias wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 02:54 pm (UTC)
It took me until my fifties to see all that unnecessary scaffolding, instead of the images.

*blush*

Go you!
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:19 pm (UTC)
Well, the internet has been yelling at me about this for years now. I doubt I would have figured anything out on my own! :)
[info]coffeeem wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:07 pm (UTC)
Oh, good work, and great examples!

(here from [info]matociquala)
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 03:20 pm (UTC)
Thank you! (And thank you for visiting!)
[info]kalquessa wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 04:00 pm (UTC)
Go you! Smite those words!
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 04:16 pm (UTC)
I'm tossing the corpses into the sea where fish can eat their eyes.

[info]b_twin_1 wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 09:06 pm (UTC)
oooo ...... Can't you hear the Deluge's siren call?? Go to it.... ;)
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 07:54 pm (UTC)
First person present tense.

EEEEK!

Not something I would attempt. I admire your bravery.

Lisa Iriarte
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 10:18 pm (UTC)
It's tricky. I usually go for third person past, but she wouldn't let me. *sigh*
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 11:06 pm (UTC)
I've wondered more than once what my character Vick would have been like if I'd written her in first person. What do you think?

Lisa Iriarte
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 14th, 2009 12:05 am (UTC)
It's hard to say! I usually find they want to be written one way and I'm in for a world of pain if I try to talk them out of it. They know much better than I do!

And I also think, for technical reasons, sometimes you need third (as opposed to first) for the ability to pull back a little. You had a couple scenes in your MS where, in first, being *that deep* in the POV would have quite possibly had traumatic effects on the reader. I had them in DELUGE, too. You can pull back and distance the reader from what's going on (for me, it was mirroring what Angela was doing) in third. Useful. Right tool for the job.

(She totally knew ahead of time. Heh.)
[info]b_twin_1 wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 09:07 pm (UTC)
Eeep! Maybe the delete key actually needs to be called the Death Key. Just sayin'. ;)
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2009 10:19 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I think you're right. *g*
[info]chibicharibdys wrote:
Apr. 14th, 2009 02:42 am (UTC)
Good examples, and thanks!
[info]jmeadows wrote:
Apr. 14th, 2009 10:17 am (UTC)
My pleasure. I hope they were useful! :)
( 29 words — Leave a word )

(W)ords and (W)ardances

In which I go on and on about writing and ferrets. And my cat. And yarn. And whatever else I happen to think of.



click tracking

Latest Month

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger